The possibility of deploying NATO troops to Ukraine is actively discussed in the West in the event of a peace agreement that includes a demilitarized zone.
According to CNN, Western politicians and military experts believe that the presence of NATO forces could serve as a reliable barrier against the Kremlin, preventing its attempts to violate the ceasefire and launch new offensive operations. However, the effectiveness of such measures remains uncertain, as in the past, peace agreements have often been disregarded during conflicts, and sanctions have not always produced the desired effect.
"Violations are certain to occur. The key question is what the agreement stipulates in terms of sanctions and measures to rectify the situation... The circumstances then and now are not the same, but the key lessons learned 10 years ago remain relevant today," says former OSCE observer mission leader Alexander Hug, emphasizing that no ceasefire is perfect.
Estonian politician Kaja Kallas highlighted that ensuring peace requires not only political will but also military assistance. According to her, the defense of Ukraine is not just a matter of its security but also the stability of all of Europe.
"The stakes for European security are extremely high. The scale of hybrid attacks in Europe has already sharply increased, and a defeat for Ukraine would cost us much more than providing assistance. Putin has shown complete disregard for international law, and he cannot be trusted. Without reliable security guarantees, any ceasefire agreement is likely to fail. Russia would simply rearm and attack again.
Source: cnn.